Talk:Netherlands: Difference between revisions
InkyPrinter (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
<h3>Asylum</h3> | <h3>Asylum</h3> | ||
Still reads as too optimistic regarding the chances of US citizens being granted asylum unless NL or the EU formally recognises the persecution of trans people in the US, as - although the idea of the Safe Countries list was scrapped in the European Parliament - functionally speaking, safe countries style assessment remains in all EU asylum claims processes and we have not yet seen any changes in that. | Still reads as too optimistic regarding the chances of US citizens being granted asylum unless NL or the EU formally recognises the persecution of trans people in the US, as - although the idea of the Safe Countries list was scrapped in the European Parliament - functionally speaking, safe countries style assessment remains in all EU asylum claims processes and we have not yet seen any changes in that.<br> | ||
I think we should stay from Asylum processes. I don't see that happen anywhere soon that americans get asylum. | |||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
Revision as of 11:54, 10 February 2025
DIY
Regarding DIY, it looks like testosterone is a controlled substance in NL (but decriminalised for small quantities). Something about the law on this might be helpful, just to be clear that it wouldn't count as a criminal act that could affect future citizenship.
Asylum
Still reads as too optimistic regarding the chances of US citizens being granted asylum unless NL or the EU formally recognises the persecution of trans people in the US, as - although the idea of the Safe Countries list was scrapped in the European Parliament - functionally speaking, safe countries style assessment remains in all EU asylum claims processes and we have not yet seen any changes in that.
I think we should stay from Asylum processes. I don't see that happen anywhere soon that americans get asylum.